Harlequin TBR Housekeeping
by Sunita
I’ve been knocking more books off the Harlequin TBR. For those of you who weren’t around when I started this TBR last year, it came into being when I downloaded all the books I had purchased directly from the Harlequin website (which I began doing in 2007). I went through this because HarperCollins decided to stop letting readers download their (DRM-protected) books to their computers; now they are only readable online or through a dedicated app. Good times.
While I was pretty sure I had most of them backed up in local folders, I downloaded every last one of them just to be sure. I wound up with 620 books, and I wasn’t sure how many I’d already read (Harlequin titles tend to run together). My first pass at the list got me down to 516 books. Then, as I would peruse the covers looking for new reads, I realized I had read more of them that I initially thought, so I went through and struck off a few more.
My next move was to get rid of author backlists if I didn’t like a book I’d read or was sure I was done with their work. As a result of these purges my last TBR read was #466.
But I’m still culling. A recent and very persuasive review by Miss Bates (Kay) sent me to see what I had by Maisey Yates in the TBR. I only had one book from my Harlequin purchases, surprisingly, and it was a novel in a Harlequin connected series in the Presents line called The Santina Crown. I’ve enjoyed some of Harlequin’s themed series, and I bought a number of these. But when I started reading her prequel novella for the series, The Life She Left Behind, I had trouble with it. It’s well written and it features reunited lovers, which is a trope I enjoy and which works well in a shorter format. But the hero is an Arab prince (named Taj for some reason) and I realized that I just can’t read Sheikh or Fake Middle Eastern Royal Hero books anymore. I’m probably also going to balk at books that glorify men in the military or the police, unless maybe if they are Regular Joe kind of guys (I’m pretty sure Janice Kay Johnson has written a few of these).
One title that has been staring at me is The Marine Next Door. It’s in the Intrigue line, which is one I have a lot of books from. I’m pretty sure I’m not going to make it through that one no matter how good it is on other dimensions. If he’s an active Marine, he probably shouldn’t be living next door. And if he’s retired from the service, why is Marine his main attribute? I went in search of answers to these questions and discovered that not only is the hero an ex-Marine, the heroine is a police officer in the Kansas City (MO, not KS) Police Department, and she’s also a single mother and a sexual assault survivor. First, that is way too much going on, and second, my ability to read genre romance set in police departments (especially in Missouri) is indistinguishable from zero at this point. Kaetrin’s review sealed the deal for me. She didn’t hate it, but what either of us could read in 2015 (and even that’s post-Ferguson) is not necessarily what we can read in the same way today.
So I’ve done another purge, and I’m down to 374 books. That’s quite a few deletions, but getting rid of all the Special Forces, other military, and police department books, along with the ones with guns in the title (more than you’d think), got me there. I also deleted more books by authors whose other books haven’t worked for me and a few short erotic novellas that I don’t see myself getting through any time soon. Maybe I’m overdoing it, and I’m keeping copies in a backup folder just in case, but I want to enjoy my leisure reading and so much feels fraught these days. I’ve been able to read “problematic” books my whole life, but it they seem more effortful today. And I’m certainly not saying no one should read and enjoy the books I’m putting aside. They’re just Not For Me Right Now.
Ugh, it’s too bad that your Yates was an HP: they’re not her best work. But I think you’ve got plenty to go with 374!!! Happy reading: I’d say go for any Lennox, Fielding, and Hart before anything else category.
LikeLike
I think the fact that so many tropes seem unappealing right now is part of why I’ve mostly stopped reading romance. I am thinking about these kinds of choices in another context: I enliven my elliptical time by streaming some long-running cop/mystery series (e.g. Law and Order). They zip along, are undemanding but keep me engaged, but I’ve been wondering how much longer I can ignore or tolerate their many issues in depictions of law enforcement, justice system, bad guys, etc. Then what???
LikeLike
@Miss Bates: It wasn’t a bad book at all, and if it hadn’t had Taj as the hero I would have kept right on. I’m definitely going to check out her Cowboy series, using your reviews as a guide. I’ve kept a bunch of the Presents in the TBR, because I like their OTT aspects, but some of the essentializing hits me the wrong way these days; I know it’s just fantasy, but I my disbelief-suspension mechanism is broken.
LikeLike
@Liz Mc2: Oh, I hear you. When I was deleting books, I kept thinking, but I like some of these authors. These could be very good books! But it kind of doesn’t matter right now. I even deleted some of my HK Dimon books, despite the fact that she’s a favorite. But I found one with a Border Patrol hero (written years ago) and I just couldn’t do it. It doesn’t matter how good a guy he is, reality would obliterate the words on the page.
I think Regency trads are working for me because the kind of formula they follow isn’t hitting me in the face with the hierarchy and the glorification of imperial power. They’re mostly just nice house-party books with at worst TSTL heroines. The alpha male is one of the factors I’m unable to read right now, except perhaps in PNR. I liked the Ilona Andrews I read and I’ve got more of their series in TBR of Doom. We’ll see.
LikeLike
I did get a chuckle out of your grumpiness re: The Marine Next Door. My husband’s sister married a guy who served in the Marines during the Viet Nam war. Even though he never made the Corp a career, he fully believed in ‘once a Marine, always a Marine’. That attitude is very strong among those who served, no matter the length of their service.
The book itself, however, would be a no-go for me for pretty much the same reasons you gave.
My reading tastes have changed over the years and the Harlequin/Silhouettes fell by the wayside. I still have a few vintage titles (and my Betty Neels!) stuck in a storage box. The Neels gets re-read, the other few–not so much.
Almost all my romance reading these days falls into the historical mystery category; with some woman’s fiction that has a solid romance and/or mystery built in supplying the rest.
I hope you can find books to enjoy in your streamlined TBR. You can always seek refuge in a Betty book when the world gets to be too much.
LikeLike
@Barb: You’re so right about Marines. One of our grad students years ago was a former Marine, and he was still fully invested even though he’d had a somewhat contentious relationship with the service.
The great thing is I still have more books than I can probably read by authors I know and authors I’ve been wanting to read; Kay’s list above names three of them. I’m also reading more mystery than I have for a while, so I definitely still have genre fiction in my reading diet. I would really miss Harlequins, though, so I’m glad I have a stack left.
LikeLike
Well that’s a blast from the past! I don’t think I’d be so tolerant of the book’s flaws and general premise now either. Some of my older reviews kind of make me cringe now! LOL
LikeLike
@Kaetrin: The past is the past. I have no end of cringeworthy reviews, but they seemed just fine when I wrote them. And this was still a good one!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sunita, can you recommend some of the regency trads you’ve been enjoying? I would love to dig up some good ones.
@Kaetrin @Sunita: I can so relate re cringeworthy reviews.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t understand why you think an active-duty Marine “shouldn’t be living next door.” My father was an active duty Marine until I was 17, and we lived in ordinary civilian neighborhoods almost the entire time, as did many other Marine families I know. Admittedly, nearly all the Marines I know are pilots, who are a slightly different bred, but still, not everyone lives on the base.
LikeLike
@Janine: In addition to the anthology I just reviewed, I’ve only reviewed a couple of Cornick books, but I have some others in the TBR. If you haven’t visited the site, Retro Regency Reads has reviews of Regencies through the 1990s, and they’ve unearthed some good ones from the old days.
LikeLike
@etv13: I was being flip, you’re quite right that it’s possible to live off base even if you’re single (since most Harlequin heroes are likely to be high enough in rank). But I would at least expect them to be close to a base if they’re on active duty. It was just possible to be posted to KC at one point but the base was closed before this is set.
However, it turns out that this hero is another ex-Marine who has joined the KC fire department. Which is believable and even likely, since so many ex-military wind up in domestic law enforcement and related agencies.
Intrigue has titles that in their own way are as eyebrow-raising (for me at least) as Presents. And in their books a military occupation, even one that is in the past, is the defining characteristic of the hero.
LikeLike
Thanks! I looked at that site about a decade ago and I recall feeling that the opinion portion of their reviews was too short and the reviews were too consistently positive to be helpful. But I just looked again and now I wonder what I was smoking back then. Maybe it’s that review sites were different at the time? Or perhaps my expectations of reviews have changed. In any case, it looks great now and I will visit it again.
LikeLike
Thank you for mentioning that historical romance website, Sunita! And Miss Bates, thanks for mentioning Hart, Lennox, and Fielding! Off to look for some of their work!
LikeLike
@Janine: It’s not just you, when I went back to look at it last week I was surprised by how useful the reviews seemed compared to years past. Either it changed or we did.
@Juhi: You’re welcome! Hope you and the little one are doing well. 🙂
LikeLike
I loved trad regencies (and trad Georgians) – read them by boatload back when they were being published on a regular basis in the 70s-90s. I looked at that website and I recognized a fair number of the the authors and titles (although I couldn’t tell you most of the plots except to say there were fewer Dukes back and more openly Heyer-influenced slang and plots).Anyway for what is worth some of my favorite authors from that list were Catherine Fellows, Clare Darcy. Paula Allardyce (more Georgian than Regency), Barbara Hazard/Lillian Lincoln, Candice Hern. Another that they don’t mention that I think is worth it is Diane Farr.
LikeLike
@Kathryn: Clare Darcy was my gateway to Regency trads after Heyer. I found her books in the library and read my way through all of them. I still have some of the old paperbacks I picked up so I could reread.
And Diane Farr! I loved her books. The Fortune Hunter has one of my favorite heroes ever.
LikeLike