Spring (ha!) update
by Sunita
Spring is supposedly here, but there is snow on the ground and the temperature is below freezing. In April! This is so, so wrong.
It’s been ages since I posted here. Work has been very busy, and whatever writing I’ve accomplished has been in other venues, mostly work-related. I’ve been reading a lot, though, which has been greatly facilitated by staying off the internet in general and social media in particular.
My January plans included multiple reading challenges, Muriel Spark readalongs, autobuy romance authors, and manga. How am I doing?
Reading challenges: These are going well. I followed the Tournament of Books again this year, reading more than half the shortlist. I was happy to see Fever Dream take it all, especially since it beat Lincoln in the Bardo in the finals, but a lot of other books I thought were excellent were taken down, sometimes in early rounds with judgments I totally disagreed with. Which is par for the course, honestly: the TOB longlist is one I always look forward to, but the shortlist and tournament decisions are rarely in sync with my preferences. I did read some very good books I probably wouldn’t have otherwise, though, and I think everyone should read White Tears and Sing, Unburied, Sing.
My Muriel Spark readalong started well but then got overtaken by TOB reading and library-hold books. I really enjoyed what I did read, though, so I plan to get back to her novels. Mid-century women authors deserve a lot more attention than they get. The intelligence, insight, and acerbity they provide are hard to find elsewhere in one package.
I haven’t been reading romance much. Mysteries have filled in the comfort-read slot for the moment. I’ve reread a few early John Le Carré novels, as planned, a Dick Francis, the first Martin Beck mystery, and the first in Mick Herron’s Slough House series. Hard as it is to admit, I think I’m just burned out on the romance genre. The new books and authors aren’t working for me (I’ve DNF’d quite a few highly regarded romances across different subgenres) and even my beloved autobuys aren’t doing the trick. It’s OK, it’s happened before when the zeitgeist and I were on non-overlapping tracks. I’ll come back. In the meantime, though, I don’t have much to say in or about Romanceland.
I fell off the manga wagon in March; just not enough time. I’ll get back to it when things slow down a bit, but I had to cancel my subscription. I still have plenty in the TBR, though.
As usual, my book challenges have me reading novels I wouldn’t ordinarily have chosen but have enjoyed immensely:
- I finally read Charles Dickens’ Hard Times and absolutely loved it. This was the book I chose to fulfill a “assigned book you hated/DNF’d” category. It’s the first Dickens book I’ve really liked and now I don’t even know who I am anymore.
- For the “celebrity book club pick” category I put a hold on Tayari Jones’ An American Marriage and it was amazingly good. It’s the story of a marriage and a lot more. It’s set in middle-class black Atlanta and explores what happens when the husband is convicted of a crime and sent to prison. Highly recommended.
- Someone recommended Frankenstein in Baghdad and I picked it up on a whim (I don’t like horror and this has a monster as a main character). It was excellent. It’s a Frankenstein story updated to war-torn, mid-2000s Baghdad, set in a once prosperous but now decaying neighborhood. There is definitely a monster, as well as a cast of varied, nuanced characters. It’s depressing, poignant, funny, and infuriating by turns. Give it a try.
- I read a couple of recent talked-up books by French authors: The Perfect Nanny by Leila Slimani and The End of Eddy by Edouard Louis. Both were worthwhile, and it was interesting to compare highly praised French novels with their American counterparts. The writing, in particular, is much less obviously impressive (and obvious) than I usually find in American lit fic novels. There are some lovely passages and turns of phrase, but at other times the writing is flat and verging on clunky (and it’s not the result of translation decisions, because I checked the original French in both cases). Surprisingly, though, it was kind of a relief from the self-conscious style of so many MFA/NYC books by US writers in the same age and class cohorts.
Now I’m buried in two very long novels which couldn’t be more different (except that they are both written by men and both have plenty of violence): Lonesome Dove by Larry McMurtry and 2666 by Roberto Bolaño. The former is a reread for a readalong with Keishon and the latter is a two-month read in one of the Goodreads groups I follow. The McMurtry has long been one of my favorites, but I’m noticing (and judging) the depictions of women and non-white characters a lot more this time, and it’s occasionally taking me out of the story. The Bolaño is unlike anything I’ve read, and I rarely know where it’s going, but it’s compulsively readable. Let’s see how I do when I get to the Ciudad Juarez serial killer section, though.
I’m tracking my reading on Goodreads and commenting there, but I’m not around on social media much otherwise. Readers of this blog know I’ve been beating the drum about the problems with social media for quite a while, and while I’m glad to see the rest of the world paying more attention, nothing much will change unless (a) a LOT of us leave social media, or (b) the government gets serious about effective regulation. Sadly, I think the former is more likely than the latter, despite the huge collective action hurdles required. The only silver lining is that the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GPDR) legislation goes into effect in a couple of months. Maybe that will help. In the meantime, check your privacy settings! Everywhere!
Your history cycling in and out of romance reading gives me hope, because I’m wondering if I’ve permanently cycled out and I miss the pleasure romance once gave me. I won’t ever have that first thrill of discovery, but maybe eventually I’ll read more of it again with more enjoyment. I do seem to go through genre phases–I read a lot of mystery, then a lot of children’s lit when my kids were young/I was teaching it regularly, then romance, now back to mystery, my first love. Maybe I’ll read children’s lit with grandkids one day (not soon!!!) and then be a romance-reading old lady.
I read Bolano’s Savage Detectives which was also long and kind of bewildering. But I did make it all the way through!
LikeLike
I’ve read 80 pages of The Savage Detectives, but for some reason haven’t gone back and picked it up, even though I enjoyed it. I am really engrossed in 2666, although I’m still in the first part. I don’t know why I’m reading what I’m reading, but I keep turning the pages.
I expect I’ll cycle back to romance, and hopefully you will too. It’s always been mystery and romance for me in terms of genre comfort (and not so comfortable) reads. I read SFF too, but not at the same pace. I’d neglected mystery for the last few years, so it feels nice to return.
Right now, apart from not finding new romances very often, it’s hard for me to separate romance from Romanceland, and after more than fifteen years of seeing calls for inclusiveness result in tiny steps (or two steps forward, one step back), I’m just burned out. And I have my own fights in my own profession to deal with.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yay, you blogged as well! I was starting to wonder…..
I’m going to find that Dickens title. I’ve been on a classic reading trend but will break it with the McMurtry and a slim paperback of a mystery novel. I bought several Dickens titles and I am anxious to get to North and South and Jane Eyre. Plus I have two shelves of classics I want to read this year. It’s all new to me.
Frankenstein in Bagdad. So noted.
LikeLike
I am having a great time reading and rereading old and classic books. Let me know when you pick up North and South because I have that in my TBR too.
If you decide you like Dickens you will suddenly acquiring enough reading material to keep you going to retirement. 🙂
LikeLike
Of course! re North and South.
Have you read Crime and Punishment yet? I have that one, too.
Decided on a PG Wodehouse book to read today. Slim novel so quick read hopefully.
I’m not sure if I’ll ever cycle back to romance. I have my faves but if I do read romance it’s older classics I prefer.
LikeLike
I’m pretty sure I read Crime and Punishment back in college, but I remember very little. I picked up The Brothers Karamazov last year but it languishes on the TBR. But like you, I’ve been slowly reading (or rereading) more classic literature over the last couple of years and really enjoying it.
PG Wodehouse is great fun and goes by quickly. I’m not the superfan a lot of readers are, but he was hugely popular in India in the 20thC and you could find his books everywhere, so I’ve read a bunch.
LikeLike
Hi Sunita! I tend to cycle through genres too – sometimes i know why my tastes change and sometimes I don’t.
When I started teaching full time I stopped reading mysteries and started reading more romance because my ability to concentrate on complicated plots (or even remember basic plot points between reading periods) was completely gone. And I wanted a guaranteed happy ending.
My reading tastes are changing again and I didn’t by know where I’ll land. Right now I’m reading a lot of escapist comfort reads. I’m still reading romance although my older comfort reads no longer interest me and I don’t care about my old fave authors or about het romance, tbh. I’m reading a lot of queer romance and that’s probably linked to my recent (second) coming out as bi. A lot of the authors I loved when I discovered mm also no longer work for me, but I think that’s to be expected.
I finally joined goodreads and I’m enjoying using it to track my reading. And the bonus is that it’s nice to connect with my online reading buddies like you and Kaetrin, especially since I’m not on SM and not as active on the romance blogs.
LikeLike
Cleo!!! *clings* It’s so nice to hear from you. I have enjoyed seeing your updates in my GR feed. I’m rarely on social media and blogs too now, and I miss the interaction. I never thought I’d go back to Goodreads, but I like being able to talk about the books I’m reading, and I follow a bunch of the Harlequin group readers so I always have all these fun reviews in my feed. And of course various people from DA and Romanceland, as well as more lit fic readers.
I only have about half a dozen old favorite romance authors left that I still track in terms of releases, sadly. They’re writing less frequently, too, which is probably why I’ve gone back to mysteries. For some weird reason, the real world has made me want more complicated plots and stories rather than more comfort reads, which would seem to make more sense. But I’m enjoying what I’m reading so whatever.
It helps that I have good libraries, because it means I can experiment without having to buy books and authors I know nothing about before I start reading them. I still buy books, of course, but now I buy books I want to reread or have on my shelf, rather than just about everything.
LikeLike
I agree about libraries. I just recently discovered Hoopla and it’s revolutionized my library use. My library system uses both Hoopla and Overdrive for ebooks and I’ve found Hoopla so much easier to search – and at least with my library, there’s usually no wait for Hoopla titles while there is often is for the titles I want in Overdrive. So I’ve been experimenting more with ebook authors. And I’ve been reading more non-fiction, but I tend to read that very slowly and in fits.
LikeLike
I only recently got access to Hoopla on my phone, when I gave up my beloved Blackberry for a Samsung, and I was able to check out a book that has a hold list at the library. I prefer reading on my ereader, but the phone is fine for occasional reading. I really feel fortunate in having access to three libraries with varying collections. Two of them stock all the Harlequin lines and one has a good selection of African-American writers as well as less publicized lit fic titles.
LikeLike
That makes sense. I prefer a tablet to ereader, but I know tablets don’t work for everyone.
I recently replaced my (rather ancient) Nook Color with a Kindle Fire and I’m kind of drunk on how many more options I have – including Hoopla. (It was a bit of an ordeal to install the Kobo and Nook apps, but now that they’re on, I have access to all of my ePub books too.)
LikeLike
I know what you mean about options, it’s amazing. And I didn’t realize you could put other ebook apps on the Fire, that’s great.
LikeLike
Sunita, I really enjoyed your TOB discussions on GR. I will admit that I put very few of those titles on my ‘maybe someday soon’ list. ‘Fever Dreams’ will probably be the one I end up reading…
I’m down to only a couple of romance authors, JAK, Meredith Duran and Sherry Thomas are the only ones I am willing to spend money on; everyone else is ‘library only–if I like the blurb’. I, too, have been reading more mysteries these days–new books from favorite authors, as well as re-reading old favorites. Is it something in the water that has so many of us doing that?
LikeLike
One book in the TOB that I liked a lot more than I expected to was Pachinko, by Min Jin Lee. I think it might appeal to you. It’s a family saga about Koreans in Japan over the 20thC. It’s very interesting in terms of the history and the female characters are front and center. I do like that about the TOB; I am pushed to try books I wouldn’t otherwise pick up.
It *is* interesting that so many of us are reading mysteries at a steady clip. I think it’s because a lot of us romance readers also read other genres, and mysteries have similar sub-categories to romance: police procedural, amateur detective, espionage, etc., and the cozy v. graphic violence divide is somewhat analogous to sweet v. hot/scorching. And the books are on the short-to-medium end, unlike SFF (which I lot of us also read). When I’m busy with work I’m less likely to embark on a doorstopper unless I have a particular reason for it.
LikeLike