Reader, I blogged.
by Sunita
Hello again. I tried the newsletter thing but it wasn’t for me. I’ve abandoned Twitter (I read my feed occasionally but don’t tweet now), and while I like Mastodon as a microblogging platform, it’s still finding its identity as a community, and the decentralization means it’s harder to find kindred spirits. So it’s a work in progress. But I still read a lot of blogs even though blogs are apparently dead dead dead, and they’re still my favorite form of conversation, especially about quotidian activities like reading and organizing my life. So I’m back.
Like a lot of people I know, I had trouble reading in the last quarter of 2016, especially after November 8. I found a bridge solution in reading fiction and nonfiction about people who had experienced or been raised in the shadow of collective traumas and managed to come out the other side. Robert Graves’Β Goodbye to All That, Paul Fussell’s The Great War and Modern Memory, Alejandro Zambra’s My Documents, and some post-apocalyptic genre fiction. Then this past January we took a week’s holiday where I read a lot in a short time, and I was off and running on the reading front, excepting times when work was overwhelming my waking hours.
I’m back to reading some romance, but only from a small handful of autobuy authors. Most of the romance novels being published today are emphatically Not For Me, at least not now. I’ve gone through these kinds of stretches before, where I read mostly other genres. Six years of reviewing at Dear Author meant that I neglected other types of fiction I’ve always enjoyed, and I’m catching up now.
Summer has been great for pleasure reading. We took an off-the-grid break in Colorado on our way out to California in late May, and I read half a dozen books and knitted most of a sweater. It’s amazing how much you can get done when your smartphone doesn’t have connectivity. π I am doing a couple of reading challenges (PopSugar and Mount TBR) and enjoying filling in the categories, but I’m not structuring my reading according to the categories.
So what have I been reading? I’m keeping track at LibraryThing and writing short reviews for most of the books. In romance and SFF, here are some recent highlights:
Nora Roberts, Northern Lights. I’ve had this book in my TBR for years. YEARS. I started it before we left St. Louis and then immersed myself at the cabin. I enjoyed it a lot. Roberts is a terrific storyteller, and although there were a couple of howlers in the Alaska setting, for the most part she captured the small-town feel and cast of characters very well. The romance was enjoyable and the balance between the romance, the mystery, and the town’s story was just right for me. I think one of the problems I’ve had with romance these days is that there is such a tight focus on the couple that we’re not getting much else, and I’ve always read for the context and the secondary characters. Now if we get much on secondary characters it’s because they’re part of a series, and the worldbuilding of a real community isn’t usually there. This book made me want to go back to the Chesapeake Bay trilogy, which I barely remember.
Sarah Morgan, Manhattan trilogy. I bought all these as they came out, started and put down the first one, and then let them languish in the TBR. After Northern Lights I restarted the first one again and blew through all three in a long weekend. They are a very fantasy version of New York City, which at first worked against them for me. But then I thought to myself, wait, Regency romances I love are still a totally fantasy version of London and 19thC Britain, so just do the mental shift. And it worked. I liked all three of the couples, and I’ve always liked Morgan’s series because she creates relationships among the women in particular and across women and men who have friendships with the opposite sex apart from their romantic relationships. I think I liked the last one, Miracle on 5th Avenue, best, in part because it was fun to read about a thriller writer. And no one does holiday romances like Morgan.
Jeff Vandermeer, Annihilation. This was a weird one. It’s the first installment of his Southern Reach trilogy, and it’s about four unnamed scientists going into a sort of postapocalyptic area to record what is there. The story is narrated entirely from the perspective of The Biologist, and most of the time the reader has no idea what is going on. I was frustrated while I was reading it, especially in the first half, but then things start to happen and the action increases. The narrator is very flat — I wondered if she was supposed to be on the spectrum — but it’s clearly intentional. At the halfway point I said I wasn’t reading the next installment, but by the end I changed my mind. #2 is sitting on my bookshelf right now.
Mary Burchell, Warrender series. I started rereading these in order last year. I’ve read them all multiple times, but not for quite a while, so I didn’t remember them all perfectly. My favorites of the first half of the series are the first one, A Song Begins, and Music of the Heart. I reviewed the latter with Jayne over at DA, so you can see details there. We also reviewed Child of Music, which I didn’t remember at all, and I liked it a lot, but for the non-romance bits rather than the romance itself.
I’m reading a lot more print books these days. I get ebook versions from the library if they’re available, because I prefer the ereader for bedtime reading, but especially for literary fiction, which I’ve been reading steadily for the last twelve months. It’s partly the ability to flip back and forth, or to see two pages at once, but it’s also because with literary fiction the formatting sometimes makes a difference in how I process the text (and it seems to be chosen more self-consciously to have that effect). I’m not going to turn into one of those “print is so much better!” people, don’t worry, but I’ve been surprised by how much I like holding a book in my hands again.
It’s nice to hear from you! I re-read the Chesapeake series about a year ago via the audio books. It was great to re-visit that series and I liked the narration. I’m doing a fair bit of re-reading these days and I think I’ll add Northern Lights to that list. I’ve also minimized by social media presence. It’s amazing how much more sewing I get done as a result, lol.
LikeLike
Thanks, Phyl! I’ve missed talking to you all on Twitter. I’m autotweeting announcements of new blog posts so that people there will know they exist, but that’s about it.
Isn’t it amazing how much time being off social media frees up? LOL. Thanks for the audiobook suggestion, I hadn’t thought of that and I have a bunch of Audible credits.
LikeLike
I listened to Northern Lights several years ago, and one of the things I remember liking about it was the way it brought the town to life, and the hero’s desire to understand and serve his new community, to do right by them.
I’ve been reading a lot more paper books too. Partly it’s more use of the library for things they don’t have as ebooks. I worry I might have a hierarchy of value here, but I don’t think it’s quite that–more complex books I really prefer in paper where I can easily fit back and forth. That goes for a complex fantasy or scifi as much as for literary fiction. And I don’t to be a book fetishist, but sometimes a paper book is a lovely object. Paul La Farge’s The Night Ocean is a beautifully designed book and I enjoyed having the hardback–which I will now pass on to a friend.
LikeLike
Those are the parts of the book that resonated for me too. It’s really the hero’s journey that is the major one, and the town is a big part of that. Roberts is very good at writing ordinary men and showing their admirable characteristics, at least in the contemporaries I’ve read.
My paper book switch is also partly using the library more, but like you, I find complex books are just easier in print, even when they’re huge. I tend to switch back and forth, but I like having the print book to hand. And in other books it’s part of the way the text is processed. In a couple of relatively short books where the narrator is quite distanced from the reader, the blank space reflects that. In my ereader, by contrast, I set everything at the same font size and margins, and even when I use the default publisher options, they all look the same.
I’m very aware that plenty of readers *can’t* hold a print book comfortably, or read the font of some books, and therefore print or e isn’t an option, it’s e or nothing. Those of us who can switch back and forth are fortunate to have the choice.
LikeLike
Yay! Sunita is blogging again! *throws streamers*
I read Northern Lights a few years ago and it’s one that I remember fondly. I watched the Lifetime movie which wasn’t anywhere near as good but it was the place where Leanne Rimes met her now husband (they were both married to other people at the time). It was a bit of a scandal IIRC.
LikeLike
Thank you! Oh, I do remember that scandal. I never watched the movie because I’d heard it was Not Good, but I liked the other dramatizations of Nora’s novels.
LikeLike
You’re back!!!! Oh, I am so happy!!!!
LikeLike
Thank you! It’s nice to be back, and I’m looking forward to talking to people online again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you’re back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No mention of Stephen King’s The Stand? or did I miss it….I’ve set it aside. I find it slow-going. The pandemic at the start of the novel was page-turning and the aftermath is kind of slowing things down with this new supernatural element (should have known this was coming) and the whole good vs. evil thing. Don’t you want to make me feel better and say, Keishon, I did skip some sections. LOL. I’m done with the RSS thing so will add you to my favorite blog list.
LikeLike
Thank you! I will definitely talk about The Stand in an upcoming post. Sorry, I did read the whole thing, but I had to put it aside regularly. The middle part is super baggy, even for King! It picks up in the last quarter but talk about a literal deus ex machina. I almost want to read the original truncated version, but not anytime soon. π
LikeLike
I’m hanging onto that “it picks up in the last quarter.” I’m reading a short book and after that I will finish it. I’m stuck in the Harold hates everybody section, btw.
LikeLike
I got really tired of Harold, so I feel your pain.
LikeLike
Yay!! I knew from your recent bits at DA that you were alive. I am so glad you have revived your blog.
‘Northern Lights ‘ sits on my Nora keeper shelf–which shrinks gradually as time goes on and my tastes change…
My best reads of the year (so far) include re-reading all the Thief books by Megan Whelan Turner, immediately followed by the new one, ‘Thick as Thieves’. Clever, so, so very, very clever! I think I like Eugenides better than
Francis Lymond, and that is saying a lot!
If you haven’t read it yet, I can join in the chorus of those praising ‘Killers of the Flower Moon’. Just keep your blood pressure medicine handy. One of the best books, so far,for me this year.
However, Mary Burchell and I are not going to be fast friends. I’ve tried! Truly!! I am not feeling the love–major apologies to you, Jayne at DA, and Miss Bates. [as I slink off to re-read my favorite Betty Neels books…]
LikeLike
Hi Barb! I’ve missed our email and blog exchanges, and my posts at DA reminded me that talking to other readers online was important to me. But it wasn’t just the one-on-ones I missed, it was watching them talk to each other about stuff I was interested in. Since I wasn’t going back to Twitter, I had to go back to blogging. π
That’s interesting about Burchell. It’s funny how alchemical the connection can be. What doesn’t work for you about her?
That’s the Grann book, right? I does look fascinating, thanks for the recommendation.
LikeLike
I think it is Burchell’s young women that don’t work for me. I think that if I had become an avid fan back in the ’60s or ’70s I could easily re-read the books through the lens of nostalgia. I do know I read several (titles long forgotten), but her books didn’t grab me then and I can’t get my brain around them now. I can admire Burchell’s prose, but I don’t connect with her heroines. I’ve given up worrying about why some authors, who are beloved by people with whom I share similar tastes, don’t work for me.
Yes, ‘Killers of the Flower Moon’ is by David Grann. I found the story fascinating and engrossing, all the while seething at the injustice of it all. Lots and lots of photos, which I think are essential in such a people-centric story.
LikeLike
I can see that. She does have some more practical, down-to-earth heroines, and a couple who are a bit older, but for the most part her heroines follow the ingenue model in a particular way. Not that that is necessarily what doesn’t work for you, but it’s amazing how many doormat heroines she wrote.
LikeLike
Yes, you may be right. I cannot abide a doormat heroine,
LikeLike
She wrote some doozies. One of my favorite books of hers, despite its WTFery, is called When Love Remains. It’s about a heroine who deceives the hero (whom she doesn’t know) to help a friend (who is unworthy of her loyalty). He falls in love and they marry and then he discovers her deception. Of course she loves him too, but when he finds out what she’s done he is understandably furious. Their marriage is a mess but somehow Burchell gets them to an HEA. It’s very high on angst and has some angry sex (closed-door because this was written in the 1930s). It’s the weirdest book but also kind of brilliant in its own way. I hesitate to call it a romance, but it’s definitely a love story. I reread it some time in the last 5 years and it still grips me. The first two reviews of it at GR sum it up pretty well.
LikeLike
Welcome back! Always good to hear from you. π I’ve missed your posts, especially your posts about planners and journals and notebooks and pens and journaling of various types.
Also wanted to thank you for your Morning Pages posts over two years ago now – for some reason, they really struck a chord with me at the time and I started doing Morning Pages (and the Morning Pages “stuck” that particular time). Morning Pages stirred up all sorts of stuff and got me back into making art (in art journals) after over 30 years. That got me interested in taking art journaling classes and then book arts classes – and in a few weeks, I’ll complete my Books Arts Certificate from the Minnesota Center for Book Arts. And art journal entries now comprise about 95% of the content on my tumblr. π
So, yeah, you’ve had an absolutely profound (and profoundly positive) effect on my life! π
LikeLike
Oh wow, that is awesome! If my blog posts helped you get going, that makes me feel soooo good. FWIW, someone else’s blog posts got me to talk about productivity stuff here; that’s what I love about blogging as opposed to other social media platforms. You don’t just link, you link and talk about why it is important to you (although links alone are fine too, I love your link roundups).
LikeLike
Great to see you back to blogging again! Like Chris said above, I missed your planners and productivity posts this year. Hope you’ll blog about those things, too.
I’ve read a couple of Burchells only, but have heard so much about the Warrender series that it’s time for me to pick them up and give them a whirl. It’s rare to find contemporaries from that era still good today.
LikeLike
Thanks! I will write some productivity posts, I’m sure, although I’ve simplified a lot so there isn’t as much new to say these days. π I hope you enjoy the Warrender books. Kay wrote a great review of the second one at her Miss Bates blog, and Jayne has her usual excellent review at DA, but beware the third book, which combines ableist attitudes of the time with one of Burchell’s strange ingenue heroes (she gets caught in a bad situation and then behaves in ways that make it worse, but without her bad behavior we wouldn’t have the same story, etc.).
LikeLike
Thanks for the warning and also pointing me to reviews of the first two books. Your productivity and planner blogs are great no matter your system.
LikeLike
Welcome back. I wish I was ready to blog again, but I’m not.
La Nora’s single titles are still my favorite books of hers. Mostly because of the depth she goes into in the world/jobs of the main characters — somebody does some research, even if she sometimes has “howlers,” as you say. It shows up in some of her trilogies too. I also find that a lot of newer romances are focused so much on the thoughts and feelings of the main characters (and sex(, that I don’t get good world building. And as fantasy and science fiction were my primary reading for many years before I got back into romance, word building is important tome.
LikeLike
Thank you, it’s good to be back. I thought Nora did a great job of evoking an Alaskan small town. It developed a personality of it’s own. And I totally agree with you on the worldbuilding. I have no problem with the stuff I don’t read being out there for the people who do like it, I’m just having a really hard time finding stuff that works for me. More than in the past.
LikeLike
So glad you’re blogging again!
LikeLike
Thank you! I missed it, and it feels great to blog again.
LikeLike