Remembering Jo Beverley
by Sunita
I was offline Monday night so it wasn’t until I woke up yesterday morning that I saw the news that Jo Beverley had died. I just sat there for a minute in shock. She was only 68, and her cancer recurrence was swift and terminal.
JoBev was one of those authors with whom I only had a few direct exchanges, but whose books permeated my reading life and set the standard for what I looked for in other historical novels. She’s best known for her Georgian series (the Mallorens) and her Regency Rogues series, and the books I’ve read in those are very good to excellent, but my favorite series was her first, the Regency series featuring the Daffodil Dandy, Kevin Renfrew.
Beverley was known for her historically rich contexts and characterizations, whether she was writing closer to the Regency trad format or longer single-title novels. One of the things I loved about her books was that her aristocrats worked. They attended Parliament, they took care of their estates, and if they were spies they actually spied, with all the unsavory aspects espionage involves.
Apart from brief Twitter conversations and the rare comment on my reviews of her books, I only had one interaction with Beverley, but I’ve always remembered it. Miranda Neville observed on Twitter that one of the best known conventions in Regency romances, that a debutante had to have the permission of Almack’s Patronesses to waltz, was nowhere to be found in the historical record. She even offered a $100 bounty to anyone who found it. Someone suggested we ask JoBev about that, since she was one of the most likely people to know. So I emailed her (with a bit of trepidation). She responded promptly and said she had never found confirmation of that either, and went on to talk a bit about Almack’s and the waltz more generally.
I used to visit her website regularly for information on 18th and 19thC history; it was an invaluable resource long before such information was more readily available online.
She was a sensible, smart, admirable, gracious presence in the romance community, and I am going to miss her a lot. I can only imagine how hard it is for her family and friends, and my heart goes out to them.
As my remembrance, I’m reposting a review I did for Dear Author years ago, of Emily and the Dark Angel, one of the Kevin Renfrew novels. It vies with Deirdre and Don Juan for the title of favorite JoBev novel.
In the spirit of better-late-than-never reviews, here is one of my favorite books of 2010.
Dear Ms. Beverley,
Before there were Mallorens, before there were Rogues, there was the Daffodil Dandy. You are justly renowned for your ability to create a fully realized world inhabited by characters across multiple books, but readers who love your historicals are not always familiar with the Regency world you created in the 1980s and 1990s. Linked together by the inscrutable, yellow-clad character of Kevin Renfrew, your early Regencies conform to the standards of the genre but invest the characters and the setting with a depth and richness which few other authors and series have been able to match. The books were published in hardcover and are available in some public libraries, but used paperback copies can be hard to find and expensive, so when I heard that the six novels in the series were being reissued in trade paper and ebook formats, I was thrilled. The reissues began in 2008 with a 2-in-1 edition entitled Lovers and Ladies, which comprised The Fortune Hunter and Deirdre and Don Juan. In 2009 Lord Wraybourne’s Betrothed, the first of the series, was reissued, and then in 2010 the last three reissues were released, culminating with Emily and the Dark Angel in October. While Deirdre and Don Juan is probably my favorite of the set, Emily and the Dark Angel is arguably the strongest novel of the six, although I encourage fans of your other work and of Regency trads to read all of them, in order, and to hunt out a copy of the short story in the series, “If Fancy Be the Food Of Love”.
Emily and the Dark Angel is set in Melton Mowbray, the famous seat of English fox hunting and the home of the Quorn Hunt. Emily Grantwich is trying to keep the family estate together under trying circumstances. Her father is an invalid, suffering injuries in a misguided, tragicomic duel with a neighbor, and her brother, the heir, is missing in battle during the Napoleonic War. When the estate of said neighbor is inherited by Piers Verderan, a rake known as the Dark Angel, Emily is repeatedly thrown into contact with him despite the warnings and fears of her friends and family. Verderan, a jaded sophisticate, has come to examine his recent inheritance, whose situation in the heart of the Quorn makes it immediately appealing despite its dilapidated condition.
The plot is deceptively simple. Aging spinster meets rake, opposites attract, spinster tries to keep estate from falling apart, people and events from rake’s past reappear in the present, and the course of true love is eventually smoothed out after a series of bumps. But while the plot and context are drawn from familiar Regency traditions, the characterizations, relationship, and context are beautifully imagined and presented. Emily is an unmarried, inexperienced, unsophisticated woman in her 20s, but she is also intelligent and quick-witted. Verderan, or Ver, is a real rake, not a fake one. He is sophisticated and ruthless, and rumors about his youthful peccadilloes swirl. But he is also intelligent, sensitive, and surprisingly patient with both his young relatives and with Emily. By the end of the novel he is still the rake we met at the beginning, but we understand how he came to be the person he is, and we can see how marriage to Emily will soften some of the hard edges even as he retains his acerbity and sophistication.
Emily and Verderan make a wonderful match, even though they are drawn to each other somewhat unwillingly. Their interactions are by turns funny, sexy, and serious. The book observes the trad norms of avoiding explicit sexuality, but you convey the sensuality of their relationship and others, very clearly. And Emily and Ver don’t engage in the annoying banter that passes for wit in so many novels today. They spar, and their dialogue reflects their intelligence, but it feels like conversation real people would have.
“You must consider yourself fortunate, Miss Grantwich, to live in the heart of the Shires.”
Emily focussed again on the road. “On the contrary, sir. The recent passion for hunting is very disruptive. As I have no taste for the chase, I get no benefit from the hullabaloo and a great deal of bother from the hunt charging across our land.”
“I’ll go odds your father and brothers don’t agree,” he remarked.
Maliciously she said, “As my father is an invalid and my brother has been missing in action for four months, I think their interest in hunting down foxes is limited.” Emily was immediately ashamed of herself. His arrogance was no excuse for her to be positively catty.
She swivelled her head up again and saw a trace of disdain which she knew she deserved. Quickly she said, “I do apologize. There’s nothing civilized you can say to such an announcement, is there? I can only excuse myself as being out of sorts after …” Emily found she could not think of a way to describe the recent contretemps.
His lips twitched with what appeared to be genuine amusement. “After being barrelled into,” he offered. “Screeched at by a lady of obviously loose morals and drowned in revolting Poudre de Violettes? A powerful excuse for any incivility, I assure you.”
Emily’s home circumstances are sympathetically and realistically depicted. Her father chafes at her assumption of control, and she finds it difficult as a single woman to conduct the business necessary to maintain the estate. She is clearly very competent, but she is constrained by the restrictions placed on her, and while she has no desire to marry her worthy but annoying and boring suitor, she knows how limited her life will be if she does not.
Verderan is a wonderful hero. His rakishness is real, his estrangement from his mother and home in Ireland understandable, and his reluctance to acknowledge his attraction to such an unlikely romantic object fun to read. When he falls, and falls hard, it’s very satisfying. The final scenes, fittingly set at the hunt, do both Emily and Verderan justice.
No review of a Jo Beverley book would be complete without a discussion of the context. This book is the penultimate book of a series, and characters from the rest of the books play major roles in it. But in your books the supporting characters never feel like series bait. There is no schoolboy organization to tie the characters together; rather, they are either related or have grown up together. You have stated in discussions of your work that you aim to create a world, and this book is an excellent example of what you mean by that. Our main characters are members of communities embedded in the larger society. They don’t exist in isolation, and their actions affect many others around them. Even Verderan, who has cut himself off from his immediate family, is enmeshed in social relationships.
The fictional world of these young people is located in the larger, real-life world of Melton and the hunting culture. While I’ve read any number of books which namecheck Melton Mowbray, Assheton Smith, and Leicestershire hunting boxes, I’ve never read one with a more fully realized depiction of that world. You weave real-life characters, such as George Osbaldeston, together with your fictional creations seamlessly. As a reader who focuses on context as closely as I do relationships and characterizations, I think this world is as successfully realized as any historical romance, especially given genre and space constraints.
The Regency trad genre has almost disappeared today, although there are a number of good authors writing somewhat related books. But for readers who miss the trad format, or who want a romance that focuses primarily on the hero and heroine and the world in which they live, and who don’t mind a book which foregoes explicit sex but retains subtle sensuality, Emily and the Dark Angel is a must read. Grade: A
I would say go in grace, Ms. Beverley, but I know you will. To borrow Kay’s words, may your memory be eternal.
Thanks for sharing this review. I’ve been trying to decide what to read to mark her passing, and I have not read her early trad Regencies, so this is perfect.
I met Jo Beverley at RomCon in Denver in 2010. It was a small conference, and I got to meet and hang out with several authors whose work I admired. I attended a historical romance tea where she was one of the features hostesses, and we chatted about proper tea and the challenges of gardening in the English climate. Later I ended up helping her and a couple of the other authors as a dresser during a delightful presentation on historical clothing — her remarks about ladies underwear were hilarious, as well as educational. She was warm and gracious, funny and intelligent, and I count the time I spent with her that weekend as worth the price of the whole convention. We have lost a wonderful woman.
LikeLike
You’re welcome, and thank you for sharing that story. I remember you talking about that back in 2010 now that you’ve jogged my memory. She really was such an intrinsic part of the community. I don’t think it’s really sunk in yet for me.
I can’t remember how I stumbled onto her trads, but I read them all one summer, tracking down library copies through ILL. I was so happy when they were re-released as ebooks.
LikeLike
I’m in shock as well and I just read the news today. In her memory, I am going to read one of her early regencies. I think I only read one of her books and enjoyed it. I’m not sure why I didn’t read more. Thanks for writing this post in remembrance of her. My condolences to her family and friends.
LikeLike
I really like the early Rogues and Mallorens books, in addition to the Regencies. I hope you enjoy whatever you choose.
LikeLike
Thank you for posting this! I think your review must be why I read, with great enjoyment, all these re-releases. My library acquired them all–perhaps it’s time to put a hold in for a re-read.
LikeLike
I feel a reread coming on too, but I’m not sure I can do one right away. Maybe in a couple of weeks.
LikeLike
I didn’t have the pleasure of meeting JoBev but I did interact with her very briefly online. I had been in total denial that Nicholas actually cheated on Eleanor in An Arranged Marriage and she popped along to advise me (very kindly) that he certainly had cheated in the service of his country. I am still inclined to put my fingers in my ears and sing “la la la” about that I admit. 😀
I haven’t read all of her trad regencies – but they are all on Mt. TBR. I plan to do some JoBev re/reading very soon.
LikeLike
I was thinking of that when I wrote the bit about spies engaging in unsavory behavior for espionage. I can totally understand your reaction, but I thought the fact that Nicholas did cheat was a great (and somewhat brave) choice on her part.
LikeLike
I read a couple of Jo Beverley’s books after I discovered the old AAR boards in the late 1990s. Her writing style in those two (Lots of very short paragraphs consisting of just one or two sentences) didn’t work for me, so I stopped there, but I remember her as a gracious presence on those boards. She seems to have been a lovely person, as well as an author who gave hours of reading pleasure to many readers. Her loss is saddening.
LikeLike
I think it’s the combination of the quality of the books and who she was as a person that makes it hit so hard. Also, she’s been around for the whole time a lot of us have been in the community. It’s not as if we all haven’t suffered loss, but some just hit hard, for reasons that are not always easy to articulate.
LikeLike